Nevada Fallacy of an LLC
Posted November 23, 2018
We just listed out the three most debtor-friendly states, but that’s where it ends. You might have heard that you can avoid taxes by forming an LLC in Wyoming or Nevada- is that true? Sure if tax fraud comes easy to you. Sorry Charlie, your profits will technically be allocated to the states in which you operate. Here is a sample allocation (or some say apportionment) which some states use to calculate your tax liability-
- Payroll- One third of your profits are allocated based on payroll. So if you have payroll expenses only in Colorado and California, but are incorporated in Nevada, one third of your LLC’s profits are split between Colorado and California after applying California’s crazy rules. Nothing is allocated to Nevada.
- Property- The second third of your profits are allocated based on property ownership and where it is located, such as real estate, inventory, etc.
- Sales- The last third of your profits are allocated based on sales and sales nexus, but this can get extremely sticky since the definition of where a sale occurs is grey- is it point of sale (seller’s location), point of purchase (buyer’s location), title transfer, fulfillment centers, etc.? Where a sale actually occurs is an argument which states and taxpayers can go around and around with- you can only imagine how it will end fighting a state with virtually unlimited resources and time coupled with their presumption of being right.
So, yes, under nexus rules perhaps a small portion of your profit can be attributed to Nevada- yet, this is not because you were incorporated in Nevada, it’s because you had a presence in a state that does not impose an income tax. Same would be true for all your sales in Wyoming, Washington, Texas, South Dakota, etc. where strict corporate income taxes do not exist. In addition, several states impose a gross sales receipts tax and other forms of alternative minimum tax although their corporate income tax rate is zero.
Note: This is a sample. Some states gives sales a larger weight. Others ignore payroll and property. Talk to your apportionment buddies at the Watson CPA Group.
This allocation boils down to nexus, and states are getting much more aggressive with claiming nexus so the income generated in that state is taxable. This might make people unhappy, but the reasoning behind it is fair in our opinion. You target a certain group of customers who live in a certain jurisdiction, and you sell computers. Why would Best Buy in the same tax jurisdiction have to pay income taxes in that jurisdiction while you do not? Please don’t use the “it’s just little ol’ me versus the big box store” excuse. Seems a bit unfair if you are Best Buy, or Wal-Mart, or Apple. Go and compete, just make it a level playing field.
Those customers in that jurisdiction perhaps enjoy a smaller tax rate and are able to have more purchasing power. That smaller tax rate might be offset by higher tax rates for the businesses. Business A (Best Buy in this example) has to subsidize the customers in the taxing jurisdiction while Business B (you) does not. Best Buy would be a bit upset in this example.
Avoiding taxes is the American way. We get it. But something about the 14th Amendment and equality and pursuit of happiness comes to mind. Then there’s that darn 16th Amendment.
States define economic presence differently. Some states, such as California, use a sales dollar threshold (sometimes referred to bright-line) to determine nexus. The Watson CPA Group is getting close to having enough California business to necessitate filing as a foreign entity there just based on revenue. Yuck, since the income tax rate is twice as much as Colorado’s. California also has a presence test where if you have an agent working for you in California, then you have income tax nexus.
Remember, this is only income sourced to that taxing jurisdiction. About half the states have nexus rules and thresholds. Can’t get enough? Here is a Journal of Accountancy article from 2010-
Don’t forget the basics such as bank accounts, licenses and permits. If you must be licensed in another state to legally conduct business such as an agent for an insurance business, this in itself might create nexus.
This book dives deep into the issue of nexus in a later chapter, with topics such as sales tax, FBA (Fulfillment By Amazon), throwback rules, and interstate commerce rules. With the recent South Dakota v. Wayfair U.S. Supreme Court case, the sales tax nexus is going to be transformed over the next several years.
This has nothing to do with international business. When your business has either a physical or economic presence in another state, you must register as a foreign entity. This is usually a formality, but some states might require your business to be in good standing with the home state. So keep up with your annual filings with the Secretary of State.
Conversely, you might simply want to create another LLC in the satellite state. This allows you to separate financial liability- for example, you might get sued in one state with unfavorable tax laws yet protect your interests in the other state (separate LLC). Bankruptcy laws change by state as well. Something to consider.
Nevada Fallacy Recap
So, don’t believe the Nevada hype. You can probably get away with not paying state income taxes on your own, but as tax and accounting professionals we are bound by such inconveniences like ethics and law. Sorry.
Another example to chew on- you have a home office in Maryland. You commute to DC to work for your only client. You incorporate in Maryland since that is where your home office is and you pay yourself a wage subject to Maryland income taxes. Wait there’s more. You also have a presence in Washington DC requiring a DC corporate tax return as a foreign entity in addition to your Maryland corporate tax return. Thankfully these and other jurisdictions have reciprocity rules.
The bottom line is that Nevada tax laws benefit business owners with a presence in Nevada. As Zig Ziglar would say, You might get a free lunch on consignment, but eventually you’ll have to pay. We encourage you to not game the system, and if you want to, the Watson CPA Group cannot be a part of it- we have too many clients relying on us to do the right thing. Pay your fair share of taxes, just not a dollar more.
Having said that, there are a zillion reasons why forming a corporation in a tax friendly state does make sense. But those are case-by-case scenarios. Nothing is a slam-dunk or carte blanche either way. The right questions must be asked and answered to reach the best decision.
Taxpayer’s Comprehensive Guide to LLCs and S Corps : 2019 Edition
This KB article is an excerpt from our book which is available in paperback from Amazon, as an eBook for Kindle and as a PDF from ClickBank. We used to publish with iTunes and Nook, but keeping up with two different formats was brutal. You can cruise through these KB articles, click on the fancy buttons below or visit our webpage which provides more information at-