Multi-Member LLC That Issues Invoices

By Jason Watson, CPA
Posted February 22, 2020

A simpler way to accomplish the same thing as above is to create three entities again, but the multi-member LLC is owned by you and the other guy, not the S corporations. The following is the preferred arrangement for a host of reasons, especially state apportionment of income and business valuation (more on that in a bit).

The S Corps issue consultation, fee for service or management fee invoices to the multi-member LLC in the amount of the revenue split driving the multi-member LLC income down to zero, or some nominal amount like $500. In other words, the payments from the MMLLC to the S Corp would be recorded as Payments for Services Rendered or Outside Contractor or something similar (see dotted lines below).

Next, the K-1 to each member would show zero, or close to zero, for member income, and the invoices would be ran through the S corporations as business income. So this still accomplishes the Eat What You Kill revenue splitting and changes the color of money through distributions from the S Corp.

This would be beneficial if you didn’t have an Operating Agreement or if you are afraid that an Operating Agreement could be too restrictive from year to year. You would still need some sort of instrument or agreement that dictated how the fees are calculated so there aren’t any hard feelings.

This is also super beneficial for regulated industries like financial advisors or real estate agents where entity ownership must be individuals. In some states and certain regulatory agencies, the MMLLC can be owned by S corporations provided the named principals are the licensed / regulated individuals… again, this arrangement avoids that issue.

You might also reduce your exposure to state nexus based on revenue or income. If the MMLLC is a California entity issuing a small K-1 to an individual running an S Corp in Illinois, you will reduce the long-reach risk of California. We are not advocating avoiding apportionment (the allocation of taxable income to other states), but at least you are more in control of what California knows and what they don’t need to know. They feel like they need to know everything, and they certainly don’t.

We do not suggest issuing 1099s in this scenario. First, a 1099 is only required to be sent to non-corporations. Even though you might have created an LLC and then later elected S Corp status, you are now considered a corporation for taxation and your vendors are not required to send you a 1099 (although many do).

Side Bar: Business tax returns such as Form 1065, 1120 and 1120S are usually prepared by tax professionals, and as such the IRS believes revenue has a much higher chance of being recorded properly, and 1099s are not necessary. It would also be ridiculous for Verizon to receive a million 1099s from its customers. Funny, Yes. But ridiculous.

Second, a 1099 has EINs and possibly SSNs. Since these dots can be connected by the IRS, the issuance of a 1099 might invite unnecessary scrutiny. The IRS agent’s question becomes “Why did you issue a 1099 to a partner rather than let the income flow through a K-1?” “To avoid taxes and headaches” is probably not going to go well during the audit.

A multi-member LLC with a zero for taxable income (or close to it) is a no harm no foul tax return. In other words, it flies well below the radar but it also above reproach. Fred, Velma and Shaggy would get two K-1s, one from the MMLC and another from their S Corp.

Here is a brief recap of three possibilities given what we’ve discussed in the previous two schematics-

• The MMLLC makes distributions to the S Corp members and issues a K-1, both in accordance with the Operating Agreement’s provisions. The S Corps pick up the K-1 as ordinary income plus external income that is earned separately from the MMLLC (moonlighting… or another MMLLC perhaps).

• The MMLLC pays guaranteed payments to the S Corp members, which fluctuate according to the Operating Agreement’s provisions. The MMLC distributes the remaining cash to the S Corp members and issues a K-1, both in accordance with the Operating Agreement.

• The MMLLC makes direct payments to the S Corps and are recorded as fees for services. This can be called a corp to corp or business to business transaction. The individuals are the members of the MMLLC, and the external S Corps are recipients of the fees for services. Each individual would receive two K-1’s; one from the MMLC and one from his or her respective S Corp.

Jason Watson, CPA, is the Managing Partner of WCG, Inc., a progressive Colorado Springs tax and consultation firm.

Taxpayer’s Comprehensive Guide to LLCs and S Corps : 2020 Edition
This KB article is an excerpt from our book which is available in paperback from Amazon, as an eBook for Kindle and as a PDF from ClickBank. We used to publish with iTunes and Nook, but keeping up with two different formats was brutal. You can cruise through these KB articles, click on the fancy buttons below or visit our webpage which provides more information at-

$24.95	$17.95	$12.95

Taxpayer’s Comprehensive Guide to LLCs and S Corps