CPA for Construction Companies

Posted Friday, March 6, 2026

Key Takeaways

  • Construction income is timeline-driven. Deposits, draws, and retainage do not align neatly with earned profit.
  • Taxes are calendar-driven. The IRS does not adjust for weather delays, lender timing, or project disputes.
  • Job costing determines survival. A small variance in labor or materials can eliminate annual profit.
  • QBI is available to most contractors, but it requires wage and income modeling to calculate correctly.
  • An S-Corp is situational. It works when margins and payroll discipline support it.
  • Payroll classification risk is real. W-2 versus 1099 decisions carry tax and insurance consequences.
  • Quarterly planning prevents April cash compression and underpayment penalties.
  • Structure absorbs volatility. Without it, growth amplifies instability.

You Build Projects With Structure. Your Financial System Shouldn’t Be Improvised.

CPA for Construction Firms You operate in an industry where revenue is earned over time, not delivered in a single transaction. Deposits are collected before work begins. Draws are submitted according to lender schedules. Retainage is withheld until substantial completion, sometimes long after the job is operational. Payroll runs weekly. Vendors expect payment immediately. Materials are often purchased before corresponding revenue is fully recognized. Meanwhile, tax obligations are calculated on a fixed federal calendar that does not adjust for inspection delays, weather disruptions, supply chain volatility, or client-driven scope changes.

From the outside, a construction firm with steady backlog appears stable. Inside the accounting system, however, income timing, cost recognition, and cash flow rarely align cleanly.

Most firms are simultaneously running fixed-bid contracts, cost-plus arrangements, and time-and-materials work. Some layer in pre-construction consulting or spec builds that introduce inventory treatment and development rules. Each contract type carries different margin characteristics and different tax implications. Treating them as a single revenue stream compresses visibility and distorts profitability.

Labor structure compounds the complexity. W-2 crews create payroll tax and workers’ compensation exposure. Subcontractors classified as 1099 require discipline in documentation and oversight. Equipment purchases introduce capitalization decisions and depreciation timing questions that affect taxable income but not necessarily available cash. Backlog can be strong while operating liquidity remains tight.

Construction accounting is not simply bookkeeping at a higher volume. It is contract-driven revenue recognition layered on top of volatile input costs, payroll compliance, multi-state exposure, and long-term contract tax rules.

This page is not about bidding strategy or surface-level deductions. It is about whether the financial infrastructure underneath your projects reflects how construction income is actually earned, measured, and taxed.

The Construction Financial Stress Index

Construction firms rarely fail because work disappears. They strain because revenue, cost recognition, and tax timing operate on different clocks.

Revenue That Doesn’t Move in Straight Lines

Construction income is staged by design. Deposits arrive before mobilization. Progress billings depend on lender approval and inspection timing. Retainage is withheld until substantial completion and may not be released for months. Change orders alter contract value mid-project. Spec builds generate no revenue until closing, even while labor and materials are fully deployed.

These streams do not behave like standard service revenue.

Friction begins when accounting method and economic reality diverge. Firms operating on cash basis may miss exposure to percentage-of-completion requirements. Others elect completed-contract treatment without modeling the compression of income when multiple projects close in the same year. When cash receipts, earned revenue, and tax recognition are not coordinated, financial statements remain technically compliant but operationally misleading.

Multi-state projects compound the complexity. Income may be allocated across jurisdictions based on payroll, property, or revenue factors. Sales tax treatment differs by state and contract structure. Profitability in aggregate does not eliminate jurisdictional exposure.

Layer self-employment tax on top of that structure and the disconnect becomes more expensive. Net income flowing through a sole proprietorship is exposed to self-employment tax unless entity design alters payroll mechanics. Without coordinated tax planning, tax liability becomes reactive rather than engineered.

Construction revenue is earned, recognized, and collected on different schedules. Treating it as linear distorts visibility.

Margin Erosion in Construction

Revenue is not the problem in most construction firms. Margin accuracy is.

A fixed-bid contract lives or dies on cost control. If labor hours are under-allocated or overtime is absorbed without visibility, the project can appear profitable until the final reconciliation. Subcontractor pricing variability introduces another layer; a single misestimated trade can compress overall margin without being obvious in aggregate reporting. Material price swings, especially in volatile markets, erode bids that were priced months earlier.

Equipment allocation is frequently misunderstood. Ownership costs, depreciation, maintenance, and utilization need to be absorbed at the project level to reflect true margin. When equipment expense is left in overhead rather than allocated proportionally, project profitability is overstated and future pricing decisions are distorted.

Overhead absorption presents the same risk. Administrative payroll, insurance, shop rent, estimating software, and project management systems must ultimately be supported by gross profit. If overhead grows faster than job-level margin, the firm becomes busier without becoming stronger.

Warranty reserves and change-order leakage further compress retained earnings. Change orders that are not tracked precisely can increase revenue without capturing the full incremental cost. Warranty exposure that is not modeled into pricing quietly eats future cash.

This is why construction job costing is not a bookkeeping preference. It is survival infrastructure. A three to five percent variance in labor allocation or material categorization can erase annual profit in a firm operating on thin margins. Top-line growth masks that reality until liquidity tightens.

Payroll & Classification Risk Layer

Construction labor is rarely uniform. Most firms operate with a combination of W-2 employees and 1099 subcontractors. The classification decision carries tax, insurance, and compliance consequences that compound over time.

W-2 crews generate payroll tax obligations, workers’ compensation premiums, unemployment insurance, and reporting requirements. 1099 subcontractors reduce direct payroll burden but increase documentation discipline and audit exposure. Misclassification is not a theoretical risk. It surfaces during payroll audits, workers’ comp reviews, or IRS examination, often years after the underlying payments were made.

Owner compensation introduces additional complexity. Sole proprietors remain fully exposed to self-employment tax on net income. S corporation elections change the character of compensation, separating salary from distributions, but only when payroll is run correctly and reasonable compensation is defensible. Confusion between personal draws and payroll wages, or payments made across related entities without clear documentation, creates both compliance and reporting distortion.

When payroll mechanics are layered on top of fluctuating project income, misalignment becomes expensive. Quarterly obligations must reflect both earned profit and compensation design. Without coordinated tax planning, payroll exposure, estimated payments, and owner distributions drift out of alignment.

Construction firms operate with real labor risk. Payroll classification, workers’ compensation exposure, and owner compensation structure are not administrative details. They are structural decisions that affect tax liability, compliance posture, and long-term margin stability.

Why Construction Firms Have a Unique Tax Profile

Construction is not taxed like a typical service business. The mechanics of long-term contracts, staged billing, and project-based cost allocation create timing differences that materially change taxable income from year to year. Firms that do not model those mechanics intentionally often find that their tax liability bears little resemblance to their cash position.

Long-Term Contract Tax Rules

Long-term contract accounting sits at the center of construction taxation. The percentage-of-completion method recognizes income as work progresses based on costs incurred relative to total estimated cost. The completed-contract method defers recognition until substantial completion. The choice affects timing, volatility, and cash-flow exposure.

Under percentage-of-completion, taxable income may be recognized before cash is fully collected. Under completed-contract, income can compress into a single recognition event when multiple projects finish simultaneously. Draw timing rarely matches tax timing.

Change orders must adjust both contract value and total estimated cost consistently. If not updated in real time, margin calculations drift. Spec construction introduces inventory treatment, shifting deductions and altering gross profit recognition entirely.

Multi-state sourcing overlays these mechanics. Income allocation may depend on payroll, property, or revenue factors. Filing thresholds can be triggered by a single out-of-state project.

These rules operate independently of how busy the firm feels. They determine how net income flows to the owner and how much is exposed to self-employment tax. Modeling them is foundational to cash-flow stability.

QBI & Structural Nuance for Contractors

Most construction firms qualify for the QBI deduction because they are not considered specified service trades or businesses. That eligibility, however, does not make the deduction automatic or uniform.

Once taxable income crosses certain thresholds, wage limitation rules begin to apply. The amount of W-2 wages paid by the business, and in some cases the unadjusted basis of qualified property, influences the allowable deduction. For contractors operating as S corporations, payroll decisions directly affect QBI calculation. A salary set too high reduces pass-through profit. A salary set too low invites scrutiny and can distort wage-based limitations.

Equipment depreciation interacts with QBI as well. Accelerated depreciation reduces qualified business income in the current year, potentially lowering the deduction, even while improving cash flow. The trade-off must be modeled rather than assumed.

High-income phaseouts further complicate the picture. Crossing a threshold in a strong year can reduce or eliminate the deduction, only for it to return in a slower cycle. Without forward-looking tax planning, the QBI benefit appears unpredictable.

Generic advice often treats QBI as a fixed percentage of net profit. In reality, it is layered on top of accounting method, payroll structure, taxable income, and capital investment decisions. Construction firms that do not model these interactions in advance either leave deduction capacity unused or claim it without structural support.

Entity Mechanics for Construction Firms

Entity choice determines how construction income is characterized and taxed, but it does not change the underlying economics of a project.

Operating on Schedule C exposes all net income to self-employment tax. For firms with stable and meaningful profit, an S-Corp election can alter the payroll mechanics by separating reasonable salary from distributions. That separation may reduce exposure to self-employment tax, but only when payroll is administered correctly and compensation reflects actual services performed.

Reasonable compensation is not a placeholder number. It must align with industry norms and the owner’s operational role. The framework underlying reasonable shareholder salary is what protects the structure during examination. Salary set artificially low in pursuit of tax savings undermines the design.

Payroll compliance is not optional once an S corporation is elected. Withholding, quarterly filings, unemployment insurance, and workers’ compensation reporting must be timely and accurate. The administrative layer increases. For firms with inconsistent margins or volatile cash flow, that added structure can create strain rather than relief.

Basis tracking adds another dimension. Shareholder distributions in excess of basis can trigger unexpected taxable events. Equipment purchases financed or contributed to the entity affect basis calculations and must be recorded correctly.

As construction firms scale, multi-entity structures sometimes become appropriate. Separating operations from development projects, equipment holding companies, or real estate ownership can clarify liability and reporting. Thoughtful business entity formation reflects economic reality. Layering entities without a defined purpose adds complexity without protection.

An S corporation is a payroll optimization tool. It is not a signal of sophistication. The election only works when margins are consistent, compensation is defensible, and compliance discipline exists. Without those elements, structure becomes administrative noise rather than leverage.

Real-World Construction Patterns

Construction problems rarely begin with collapse. They begin with patterns that feel manageable until scale exposes the weakness underneath them.

One common pattern is strong revenue paired with thin cash. The firm is busy. Backlog is strong. Revenue grows year over year. Yet liquidity remains tight and distributions feel constrained. The issue is rarely lack of work. It is the interaction between job costing, accounting method, and cash timing. Percentage-of-completion may recognize income before retainage release. Equipment purchases may reduce taxable income while consuming cash. Overhead may not be absorbed accurately across projects.

The correction is structural: rebuild job-level reporting, model cash flow separately from taxable income, and align quarterly estimates through disciplined tax planning rather than reacting to bank balance.

Another pattern appears when a growing general contractor layers payroll complexity onto expanding crews without reinforcing compliance infrastructure. Early-stage firms may operate with a lean administrative function. As projects scale, W-2 headcount increases, subcontractor relationships expand, and workers’ compensation exposure rises. Payroll systems that were “good enough” at ten employees become fragile at thirty. Misclassification risk increases. Overtime tracking weakens. Owner compensation is treated casually. The fix is not simply hiring a bookkeeper. It is redesigning payroll architecture: clear classification standards, disciplined reporting, and coordination between compensation structure and tax projections. Growth without payroll discipline amplifies exposure quietly until an audit forces the issue.

A third pattern shows up when the owner begins to feel the weight of self-employment tax. Net income is strong, but a significant portion flows directly through Schedule C and is fully exposed to self-employment tax. Quarterly payments feel large and disconnected from perceived take-home income. The instinct is often to pursue aggressive deductions or accelerated depreciation. In many cases, the more appropriate response is structural: evaluate whether an S-Corp election is supported by consistent net profit and administrative capacity. When payroll is implemented correctly and reasonable compensation is defensible, the character of income changes. When it is layered on top of volatile margin, it introduces new friction. The decision must be modeled, not assumed.

Multi-state expansion introduces a different pattern. A firm wins projects across state lines and views it as pure growth. Over time, payroll is allocated to different jurisdictions, materials are sourced in multiple locations, and subcontractors operate under varying licensing regimes. Nexus thresholds are crossed quietly. Apportionment formulas begin to apply. Filing requirements accumulate. The issue is rarely visible in the first year. It surfaces after notices arrive or when a return is prepared without coordinated allocation. The structural fix is proactive modeling of income sourcing and payroll allocation before expansion accelerates, not after penalties are assessed.

The final pattern often affects spec builders. Capital is deployed into land acquisition, development, and construction with the expectation of sale upon completion. Carrying costs accumulate. Inventory treatment defers deductions. Market shifts delay closings. On paper, the firm may show limited taxable income during development and a concentrated recognition event at sale. Cash may be tied up in projects longer than anticipated. Without modeling inventory treatment, financing costs, and projected disposition timing, liquidity becomes strained. The correction requires separating development economics from operating revenue and modeling capital deployment alongside tax exposure.

None of these patterns are unusual. They are predictable stages in the life cycle of a construction firm. The difference between recurring strain and controlled growth is whether the financial structure evolves as the projects scale.

Entity Structure for Construction Firms

Entity decisions in construction are often made early and rarely revisited. A license is obtained, an LLC is filed, and operations begin. The structure then remains unchanged long after revenue scale, contract size, and payroll complexity have evolved.

Operating as a sole proprietor is administratively simple. Income flows onto Schedule C. There is no separate payroll for the owner. In early-stage firms with inconsistent margins, that simplicity can be appropriate. The tradeoff is full exposure of net income to self-employment tax and no separation between labor income and return on capital.

Forming an LLC typically follows for liability reasons. From a federal tax standpoint, however, an LLC is neutral unless an election is made. It does not change income characterization or self-employment exposure. Filing formation documents is not the same as designing entity mechanics. Thoughtful business entity formation reflects how projects are structured, how equipment is owned, and how liability and profit are layered.

The S corporation discussion becomes relevant once net profit stabilizes at a meaningful level, often north of approximately $75,000 in consistent annual net income. At that scale, an S-Corp election can separate reasonable salary from distributions and alter payroll mechanics. The benefit is mathematical.

That math requires discipline. Compensation must align with the framework of reasonable shareholder salary. Payroll must be administered correctly. Withholding, quarterly filings, unemployment insurance, and workers’ compensation reporting must align with compensation design. When margins fluctuate or compliance is weak, the structure adds complexity without delivering durable savings.

Construction volatility matters. Backlog can appear steady while project-level margins swing. If income is inconsistent or concentrated in a few contracts, fixed payroll obligations can create strain. Structure should follow demonstrated profitability, not projected growth.

Equipment ownership introduces additional nuance. Heavy machinery and vehicles affect depreciation, basis, and liability exposure. In some cases, separating equipment into its own entity clarifies risk and leasing arrangements. In others, consolidation simplifies reporting. The decision should reflect operational reality rather than template-driven structuring.

As firms expand into development activity or multi-crew operations, multi-entity structures may become appropriate. Separating operations from development or equipment holding can reduce liability concentration and improve reporting clarity. When layered intentionally, multi-entity design aligns with economic substance. When layered casually, it produces administrative drag.

A late S-Corp election may be available once profitability stabilizes and administrative capacity improves. Re-evaluating entity design as scale increases is strategic, not corrective.

An S corporation is not sophistication. It is a payroll optimization tool. It works when margins are consistent, compensation is defensible, and compliance discipline exists. When those conditions are absent, simpler structures are often more stable.

Tax Strategy Framework for Construction Firms

Creative tax tactics do not stabilize construction income. Coordinated modeling does. It must reflect how contracts are earned, how costs are incurred, and how cash actually moves. In construction, strategy is structural.

Quarterly Modeling

Quarterly modeling in construction is not a simple extension of last year’s numbers. It requires simulating the return before the year closes and adjusting for how projects are actually progressing.

Project completion timing must be layered into projections. A contract that moves from 60 percent complete to 85 percent complete in the fourth quarter changes taxable income materially under percentage-of-completion rules. Retainage release can accelerate recognized income even when cash remains partially withheld. Change orders alter both contract value and total estimated cost, which in turn affects profit recognition under long-term contract methods.

Large equipment purchases introduce another variable. Section 179 or bonus depreciation can compress taxable income in the current year while consuming cash at the time of acquisition. The interaction between depreciation elections, method of accounting, and projected net income must be modeled rather than assumed.

Without forward-looking projections, construction firms discover their tax position after the fact. With disciplined tax planning, quarterly payments reflect earned profit, contract timing, and capital decisions in real time. The objective is not to eliminate volatility. It is to anticipate it.

Retirement & Capital Strategy

Retirement strategy in construction sits inside the entity and payroll design. It does not exist separately. It depends on entity design, payroll structure, and consistent profitability.

A properly structured Solo 401(k) can allow significant deferral once wages and net profit reach sustainable levels. SEP IRAs offer simplicity but become limiting as income increases because they rely solely on employer contributions tied to net earnings. For firms with stable and substantial margins, defined benefit or cash balance plans can shift meaningful income into tax-deferred vehicles. These plans require predictable cash flow and coordinated compensation design to function properly. 

Capital deployment decisions intersect with retirement planning. Purchasing equipment may provide immediate operational benefit and accelerated depreciation, but it also consumes liquidity that could otherwise fund retirement contributions. The decision is not purely tax-driven. Capital allocation, cash reserves, and retirement contributions pull from the same profit pool. The math has to be coordinated.

Retirement strategy in construction must be modeled alongside contract timing and payroll mechanics. Otherwise, it becomes an afterthought layered onto unstable income.

Deduction Discipline

Construction firms generate legitimate business expenses at scale. Equipment, tools, vehicles, trailers, subcontractor payments, insurance, job management software, shop rent, materials, licensing, and continuing education all reduce taxable income when categorized correctly.

Depreciation strategy requires deliberate choice between Section 179 expensing and bonus depreciation. Accelerating deductions may reduce current-year tax but distort future profitability if not aligned with projected income. Vehicle expenses must be supported by accurate mileage or actual cost tracking. Subcontractor payments require clean documentation to withstand scrutiny. Insurance and overhead allocations must be recorded consistently to preserve margin visibility.

Aggressive deduction posture without structural clarity is not strategy. If your “strategy” starts and ends with depreciation without fixing job costing, you’re optimizing noise. The foundation must be accurate project-level reporting and coordinated income modeling.

When quarterly projections, retirement design, and disciplined expense classification operate together, tax outcomes become predictable. Construction will always carry timing complexity. The objective is to engineer the financial system so that complexity does not erode retained profit.

Scaling a Construction Company

Scaling in construction is limited by infrastructure, not opportunity.

Adding crews increases revenue capacity but also payroll tax exposure, workers’ compensation premiums, and administrative load. Overhead often accelerates faster than revenue. Without modeling margin per project and per crew, growth becomes activity rather than equity creation.

Backlog visibility is not working capital strength. Early-stage projects consume labor and materials before generating sufficient billings. Retainage delays liquidity. Change orders may increase contract value without immediate cash impact. Working capital modeling must sit alongside backlog reporting.

Margin per project is the real signal. Revenue can double while profitability weakens if overhead absorption and cost control are not aligned. Job-level reporting must inform firm-level decisions.

Equipment strategy shapes scalability. Financing preserves liquidity but creates fixed obligations. Ownership ties up capital. Leasing alters long-term cost structure. The decision should reflect utilization rates and tax modeling, not habit.

As firms expand across jurisdictions, payroll registration, licensing, bonding, and income allocation multiply. Scaling without coordinated reporting increases exposure quietly.

Compliance CPAs report what happened. We design systems that determine what happens next.

Build Structure That Matches Your Work

Construction operates on timing friction, cost volatility, and thin margins. The financial system underneath that environment must be engineered with the same discipline as the projects themselves.

If contract method, entity structure, and job-level margin reporting are not coordinated, growth will eventually surface the weakness.

See how we approach construction operators.

When you’re ready to examine your structure directly, connect with us.

You manage projects.
We engineer the financial systems underneath them.

FAQs

Why do contractors feel profitable but run out of cash?

Because taxable income, earned revenue, and collected cash operate on different schedules. Percentage-of-completion recognition, retainage withholding, equipment purchases, and overhead absorption can create profit on paper while liquidity tightens.

What is percentage-of-completion?

It is a long-term contract method that recognizes income based on costs incurred relative to total estimated project cost. Taxable income is reported as work progresses, not when the job is finished.

Do all contractors need an S-Corp?

No. An S-Corp can reduce self-employment tax when net profit is stable and payroll is handled correctly. If income is volatile or compliance discipline is weak, the election adds complexity without structural benefit.

How does retainage affect taxes?

Retainage may represent earned revenue that is withheld for contractual reasons. Depending on accounting method and contract terms, it can accelerate or defer taxable income. Mishandling it distorts both margin and cash modeling.

Does QBI apply to construction companies?

Generally, yes. Most construction firms qualify for QBI. The size of the deduction depends on taxable income, W-2 wages, and capital investment. It must be modeled alongside payroll and depreciation decisions.

Should subs be 1099 or W-2?

Classification depends on control, supervision, and the nature of the work. Misclassification can trigger payroll tax exposure, workers’ compensation adjustments, and audit risk. It should be determined based on substance, not convenience.

Why does job costing matter so much?

Construction margins are thin and volatile. Inaccurate labor allocation, material categorization, or overhead absorption can erase project-level profit even when revenue appears strong.

How do multi-state projects get taxed?

Working across state lines can trigger income allocation, sales tax obligations, payroll registration, and filing requirements. Apportionment formulas vary by jurisdiction and must be modeled proactively.

What deductions do contractors miss most often?

Equipment depreciation elections, vehicle allocation, subcontractor documentation, insurance classification, shop rent, software systems, and licensing costs are frequently miscategorized or underutilized.

What should I look for in a CPA as a contractor?

Someone who understands long-term contract methods, job-level margin reporting, payroll classification risk, QBI mechanics, and entity structure. If they treat construction like generic service income, margin visibility is already compromised.

Tax Planning Season

Tax planning season is here! Let's schedule a time to review tax reduction strategies and generate a mock tax return.

Tax Planning Services
Bookkeeping Services

Tired of maintaining your own books? Seems like a chore to offload?

Accounting Services

Professional Consultation

Did you want to chat about this? Do you have any questions for us? Let’s chat!

The tax advisors, business consultants and rental property experts at WCG CPAs & Advisors are not salespeople; we are not putting lipstick on a pig expecting you to love it. Our job remains being professionally detached, giving you information and letting you decide within our ethical guidelines and your risk profiles.

We see far too many crazy schemes and half-baked ideas from attorneys and wealth managers. In some cases, they are good ideas. In most cases, all the entities, layering and mixed ownership is only the illusion of precision. As Chris Rock says, just because you can drive your car with your feet doesn’t make it a good idea. In other words, let’s not automatically convert “you can” into “you must.”

Let’s chat so you can be smart about it.

We typically schedule a 20-minute complimentary quick chat with one of our Partners or our amazing Senior Tax Professionals to determine if we are a good fit for each other, and how an engagement with our team looks. Tax returns only? Business advisory? Tax strategy and planning? Rental property support?

Text WCG Offices

Text WCG Offices

Need to get in touch through a quick text? We'll respond within a day.

Chat our amazing team

Call Our Team

Need to speak to a tax professional now? Give us a call 719-387-9800 and we'll get you connected.

Chat with a tax pro

Chat With a Tax Pro

Taxes can be tricky. Chat with a WCG human now and get questions answered.

After almost 6 years with this CPA group, there is NO ONE else we would trust to do our taxes.

L. Matisek

See Review

We've worked with multiple bookkeepers and accountants over the years and WCG has completely blown us away.

N. Sellden

See Review

As a novice business entrepreneur they provided me with the tools to both structure and tax my business efficiently

Mayon Hight

See Review

They've made my taxes a breeze and are worth every dime I pay them for the peace of mind their services provide.

Lynn Shannon

See Review

The good folks at WCG have impressed me, as being highly competent, patient & friendly.

Fred LeBlanc

See Review

They've made my complicated business life simple and I'd recommend them to anyone with a slightly complicated-to-overwhelmingly complicated tax strategy!

Nic J

See Review

For nearly nine years, I have had the privilege of working with WCG and their team of exceptionally knowledgeable and experienced CPAs.

Alex Hickman

See Review

Amanda - WCG CPA - You guys have been invaluable in helping us get this business and tax planning setup properly and executed correctly.

Lance Dodd

See Review

WCG is extremely knowledgable, timely and attune to the unique aspects of our businesses.

Carl Protsch

See Review

WCG CPAs are professional and a pleasure to work with.

Nakapan P.

See Review

They go beyond the call of duties to assist me not only with Tax return matters but with any questions on other personal and company tax matters.

Juan Mayorga

See Review

I've always dreaded tax season, but WCG has made things so easy, even as we changed to an S corp. So happy we found them!

Paige de Kock

See Review

It was great to find an accounting firm eager to take on new clients, answer initial questions in depth, and support our “keep it simple” philosophy.

Stuart B.

See Review

Working with WCG was so easy, shout out to Sally Rhoades who handled my complicated tax situation this year wonderfully and was available for all my questions.

Stefani Cinto

See Review

I am so thankful to be a client of WCG CPAs & Advisors.

Carol Kersten

See Review

It's a wonderful and rare treat to find a company like WCG these days with their high level of service, personal approach, and deep knowledge of accounting.

Jeffree Hilton

See Review

Such a great firm. Great communicators, great attention to detail and overall great people.

Jeff Owens

See Review