CPA for Psychologists

Posted Friday, March 6, 2026

Key Takeaways

  • Psychologist income is structurally fragmented, even when total revenue looks strong.
  • Assessment work carries high fees and high costs. Gross battery revenue is not pure margin.
  • Self-employment tax compounds quietly across 1099 and hybrid income streams.
  • QBI is not automatic. As a Specified Service Trade or Business, thresholds and wage design matter.
  • S-Corp status is situational. It works when profit is stable and compliance is disciplined.
  • Quarterly modeling prevents tax shock. Waiting until April guarantees it.
  • Hybrid income — W-2, private practice, consulting, forensic — requires coordination, not guesswork.

You Decode Cognitive Complexity. Your Financial Structure Shouldn’t Be the Weak Variable.

CPA for Psychologists You hold cognitive complexity for a living. You move between a WAIS, WISC, MMPI, PAI, or BASC without hesitation. You synthesize data, nuance, behavior, and history into conclusions that actually make sense. You explain difficult findings clearly. You tolerate ambiguity professionally. Very little about your clinical world is simple, and that’s exactly why you’re good at it.

The financial side of your life shouldn’t be the part that feels murky.

Most psychologists were trained deeply in assessment, ethics, research methods, and diagnosis. Very few were trained in payroll mechanics, entity elections, QBI phaseouts, or how basis tracking works inside an S-Corporation. Revenue recognition for retainers, self-employment tax layering, and retirement limit coordination were never part of the curriculum either. You learned how to interpret protocols. You were not taught how to architect a business that supports assessment-heavy revenue, hybrid income, and long-term growth.

That gap shows up quietly.

Assessment work brings high fees, but it also brings high material costs, scoring licenses, software subscriptions, and long report-writing hours that never appear as line items on an invoice. Therapy income may feel steadier, until cancellations or insurance delays shift the month unexpectedly. Add W-2 academic income, 1099 consulting, supervision, or forensic retainers, and the structure underneath your revenue starts to matter more than the top-line number.

None of that means you’re careless with money.

It means you operate in a profession where income is layered, expenses are specialized, and tax exposure compounds across multiple streams. Hybrid structures like W-2 income combined with private practice, consulting layered onto assessment work, and irregular forensic retainers create structural friction that generic accounting advice rarely anticipates.

You understand how to build a testing battery that answers the right question. Most psychologists were never shown how to build financial infrastructure with that same level of precision.

That’s the work here.

The goal isn’t to turn psychologists into tax technicians. It’s to install structure beneath your income so high-revenue months translate into retained profit, hybrid compensation doesn’t create surprise tax exposure, and entity decisions are modeled instead of guessed. When the architecture is sound, the financial noise quiets.

The Psychologist Financial Stress Index

Income That Doesn’t Behave

From the outside, psychologist income can look impressive. Assessment batteries command strong fees. Therapy sessions stack up quickly. Consulting or expert witness work pays well. Academic roles add stability. On paper, it looks diversified and intelligent.

Underneath, it’s fragmented.

Private-pay therapy deposits quickly and feels clean, but it’s fully exposed to self-employment tax unless structured intentionally. Insurance reimbursement adds another layer, often arriving weeks after services are rendered and sometimes reduced without warning. Assessment packages are high-ticket, but episodic. A strong testing month can be followed by a quieter one with no obvious reason. That makes cash flow uneven even when annual revenue looks solid.

Forensic retainers complicate perception further. A large upfront payment can create the illusion of liquidity, but that retainer often represents work to be performed over months. Revenue recognition and cash reality don’t always align. Cash received does not always equal income earned. Especially in states with strict psychometrist supervision rules. If basis isn’t monitored, what looks like a simple distribution can create unexpected taxable income. If estimates aren’t modeled properly, that single deposit can distort tax exposure for the entire quarter.

Then layer in 1099 consulting, supervision, speaking, or expert witness work. Add a W-2 academic or hospital salary with its own withholding assumptions. The withholding from a university paycheck almost never accounts for the independent income layered on top. Self-employment tax compounds quietly across those 1099 streams, whether the cash feels abundant or not. If no one has walked you through how self-employment tax applies across hybrid income, that’s often where the first leak exists. 

Forensic work can introduce multi-state exposure as well. Depositions, evaluations, or testimony across state lines create additional complexity that generic planning rarely anticipates.

The common thread is this: quarterly estimates are usually missing or reactive. Without forward modeling, high-income months feel successful until April exposes the structural gap. Planning replaces that pattern. Guessing guarantees it. 

Income isn’t the issue. Uncoordinated income is.

Assessment Revenue Is High Margin — Until It Isn’t

Assessment work is often assumed to be the most profitable segment of a psychologist’s practice. The battery fee is high. The invoice looks substantial. Compared to weekly therapy sessions, it feels efficient.

The margin story is more nuanced.

Testing materials are not trivial. Pearson, PAR, and WPS kits are capital expenses. Protocols are consumed per administration. Digital scoring platforms require recurring licenses. HIPAA-secure storage systems are mandatory, not optional. Updates and new editions require reinvestment. Those costs don’t disappear just because the invoice is large.

Then there’s time.

Report writing is often the most cognitively demanding part of the work, and it’s rarely billed hour-for-hour. Interpretation, collateral review, school meetings, feedback sessions, and follow-up documentation extend beyond the face-to-face evaluation. The effective hourly rate narrows once those hours are mapped honestly.

Insurance-based assessment adds another layer. Revenue may be posted in your billing system, but reimbursement may be reduced, delayed, or denied. Write-offs erode what was originally expected. Posted revenue is not the same as collected cash.

Gross battery fee does not equal net retained profit.

When testing costs, software, protocol consumption, and true time investment are tracked correctly, the real margin becomes visible. When they aren’t, psychologists often overestimate profitability and underprepare for taxes at the same time.

High revenue without precise cost mapping creates confidence at the top line and stress at the bottom.

The Hybrid Academic + Private Practice Trap

Many psychologists operate in two worlds simultaneously. A university or hospital role provides a W-2 salary, benefits, and retirement contributions. Private practice generates additional income. Consulting, speaking, supervision, or expert witness work may layer on top.

On the surface, that structure feels stable and diversified.

Underneath, it requires coordination.

W-2 withholding is calculated based on that salary alone. It does not anticipate private-pay therapy revenue or 1099 consulting layered alongside it. Self-employment tax applies to the independent portion, even though a paycheck is already being taxed elsewhere. Without integrated projections, withholding mismatches create predictable shortfalls.

Retirement planning complicates things further. A 403(b) at a university interacts with a Solo 401(k) or other retirement structure tied to private practice income. Contribution limits are coordinated across plans, not duplicated. Without modeling total compensation across all sources, contribution ceilings can be misunderstood or underutilized.

Benefit cliffs can also distort decisions. Changes in private practice income may affect student loan repayment calculations, health insurance subsidies, or other income-sensitive programs. When compensation streams are viewed in isolation, those interactions are missed.

Hybrid income isn’t a problem. It just demands coordination. When W-2 wages, 1099 revenue, and retirement contributions are projected together rather than separately, the structure becomes intentional instead of reactive. That shift alone eliminates much of the recurring stress psychologists associate with taxes.  

Why Psychologists Have a Unique Tax Profile

Psychologists don’t just have “private practice income.” They have layered income, and the layers behave differently depending on how they’re structured. That distinction drives everything from self-employment tax to retirement limits to whether certain deductions survive at all.

Revenue characterization is not cosmetic.

Operating on Schedule C as a sole proprietor is straightforward. Net profit flows directly onto your personal return, and every dollar is exposed to income tax and self-employment tax. It’s clean. It’s simple. It’s also fully layered with both sides of Social Security and Medicare. If no one has modeled how that compounds over time, it often becomes the most expensive surprise in private practice. 

Electing S-Corporation status changes the mechanics, but not automatically the outcome. You introduce payroll. You separate reasonable salary from distributions. You alter how self-employment tax applies. But the benefit only exists if salary reflects actual services performed and is defensible under scrutiny. Too low creates risk. Too high erodes savings. Execution matters more than the election itself.  

Then layer in hybrid income. A W-2 academic or hospital role behaves one way. Payroll taxes are withheld automatically. Retirement limits are tied to reported wages. A 1099 contract for consulting or supervision behaves differently. There is no withholding. Self-employment tax applies in full unless structured properly. Forensic retainers add another wrinkle. Cash may be received upfront, but income recognition depends on the work performed. If retainers are treated casually, tax exposure can be distorted across quarters.

Once an S-Corp is involved, basis tracking becomes part of the equation. Distributions are only tax-efficient if sufficient basis exists. If basis isn’t monitored, what appears to be a clean distribution can create unexpected exposure. That’s not a theoretical issue. It’s a bookkeeping discipline issue.

Retirement contributions add another layer of complexity. Contribution limits are calculated based on compensation type. W-2 wages cap certain contributions differently than Schedule C profit. S-Corp distributions do not count as earned income for retirement purposes, which means payroll design directly influences how much can be sheltered. Without coordinated modeling, retirement capacity is either underutilized or misunderstood.

This is why revenue characterization is structural, not aesthetic. It determines how self-employment tax layers across income streams, how retirement ceilings are calculated, and how much of your revenue actually stays retained.

Then there’s QBI.

Psychologists are generally classified as a Specified Service Trade or Business, which means the Qualified Business Income deduction does not operate the way it does for other industries. Once taxable income crosses certain thresholds, the deduction begins to phase out. Wage levels, total compensation, and entity structure directly influence whether any portion of that deduction survives.

This is where generic advice tends to fall apart. “You probably don’t qualify” is often shorthand for “no one modeled it.” The interaction between W-2 wages, S-Corp salary, pass-through profit, and overall taxable income determines whether QBI phases out entirely or remains partially available. In some cases, strategic payroll design preserves part of the deduction. In others, the math eliminates it. Either way, it should be calculated, not assumed.  

QBI is not a buzzword. It is a formula layered directly on top of your entity and compensation structure.

At its core, the tension many psychologists experience is simple. You optimize testing batteries carefully. You select instruments intentionally. You interpret data with nuance. Most psychologists have never applied that same rigor to payroll mechanics, entity elections, or tax modeling.

When cognitive complexity is paired with weak financial infrastructure, anxiety follows. Not because you lack competence, but because the system underneath your income was never engineered with the same precision you bring to your clinical work.

Real-World Psychologist Scenarios

Most financial strain in psychology doesn’t come from failure. It comes from growth layered onto weak structure. The revenue increases. The work expands. The infrastructure underneath it stays static. Over time, that gap becomes stress.

Consider the assessment-heavy private practice.

Battery fees are strong. The schedule is full. From the outside, profitability looks obvious. But testing materials are expensive and ongoing. Protocols are consumed per administration. Digital scoring licenses renew annually. Reports take hours that are never billed directly. When those costs aren’t mapped precisely, net profit is overstated on paper and understated in reality.

The tax consequence follows quickly. If deductions aren’t tracked accurately, you overpay. If revenue is high but quarterly projections are missing, you underprepare. Strong months create large tax exposure that feels disconnected from the actual cash retained.

The solution isn’t complicated, but it is structural. Cost mapping per battery. Margin modeling that reflects true time investment. Quarterly projections that anticipate episodic revenue rather than assuming smooth monthly flow. Once gross revenue and real margin are separated, clarity replaces guesswork.

Now look at the academic hybrid psychologist.

A W-2 university or hospital role provides stability and benefits. Private practice income layers on top. Speaking engagements, supervision, or consulting may add additional 1099 income. Each stream behaves differently, yet they interact at tax time whether you coordinate them or not.

Withholding from the W-2 salary is calculated in isolation. It does not account for private-pay revenue or consulting income. Self-employment tax applies to the independent portion, even though payroll taxes are already being withheld elsewhere. Retirement contributions complicate things further. A 403(b) at the university interacts with a Solo 401(k) tied to private practice. Contribution limits are coordinated across plans, not duplicated.

Without integrated modeling, withholding mismatches become predictable and retirement ceilings are either misunderstood or underutilized. The fix is coordination. All compensation streams projected together. Retirement strategy aligned across accounts. Withholding adjusted intentionally rather than reactively. That shift alone eliminates much of the recurring tax shock hybrid psychologists experience. 

Then there’s the forensic psychologist.

Large retainers can create the illusion of liquidity. A single case may generate substantial revenue, but the work unfolds over months. Income may be recognized unevenly. Depositions cross state lines. Testimony introduces multi-state exposure. Billing is irregular, and payment cycles are unpredictable.

The tax consequence often arrives in waves. A high-revenue quarter creates a large estimated payment that feels disproportionate. Multi-state activity can trigger nexus considerations if not monitored carefully. Without forward modeling, income spikes translate directly into quarterly shock.

Structured estimates, entity alignment, and realistic cash-flow projections change that dynamic. When retainers are mapped against expected work and multi-state exposure is reviewed proactively, volatility becomes manageable instead of disruptive.

Finally, the growing assessment clinic owner.

What began as a solo practice now includes psychometrists, additional psychologists, or contractors. Revenue increases. So does complexity. Contractor versus W-2 classification becomes more than a preference; it becomes a compliance decision. Revenue splits may feel generous but compress effective margin once overhead is allocated accurately. Protocol costs must be distributed properly across clinicians to understand true profitability.

The tax risk here isn’t just overpayment. It’s exposure. Payroll errors invite scrutiny. Misclassification can trigger penalties. Profit appears healthy until overhead and compensation are modeled honestly.

Structural cleanup is the turning point. Compensation modeling aligned with real margin. Clear payroll systems. Protocol cost allocation that reflects actual usage. Forward projections that measure net profit per clinician rather than gross testing revenue.

None of these situations are unusual. They are natural phases in a psychologist’s career.

The difference between ongoing stress and predictable growth isn’t intelligence or work ethic. It’s whether the financial structure evolves alongside the practice.

Entity Structure for Psychologists

Entity decisions in psychology are often made quickly and with incomplete information. A colleague says, “Form an LLC.” An online forum insists, “Elect S-Corp immediately.” Paperwork gets filed, and everyone assumes the hard part is done.

In reality, entity structure is not a branding choice. It is a tax and payroll mechanism that should reflect how your practice actually earns money.

Operating as a sole proprietor is often the cleanest starting point. Income flows directly through Schedule C. There’s no separate payroll system. Bookkeeping stays relatively straightforward. For early-stage practices, psychologists building caseloads, or clinicians with volatile assessment volume, that simplicity can be entirely appropriate. Complexity for its own sake rarely creates savings.

An LLC, by itself, is usually tax-neutral. It may provide liability separation, which matters in clinical and forensic work, but it does not automatically reduce taxes. Many psychologists assume forming an LLC changes their tax outcome. It doesn’t unless an additional election is made. That misunderstanding alone creates unnecessary confusion.  

The S-Corp conversation typically becomes relevant once net profit stabilizes and self-employment tax becomes meaningfully painful. As a rough benchmark, when consistent net profit moves north of roughly $50,000, modeling the math starts to matter. The potential benefit comes from separating reasonable salary from distributions, which can reduce the portion of income exposed to self-employment tax.  

But that benefit is conditional.

Reasonable salary must reflect the services you actually perform. It cannot be artificially low to chase tax savings. Payroll must be run consistently and on time. Corporate filings must be accurate. Bookkeeping must support the structure. The S-Corp is not a loophole. It is compliance layered on top of payroll mechanics.  

Once an S-Corp is in place, basis tracking becomes part of the discipline. Distributions are only tax-efficient if sufficient basis exists. If basis isn’t monitored properly, distributions can create unexpected exposure. What looks like a simple transfer can carry consequences if the underlying accounting isn’t maintained.

Timing matters as well. Some psychologists assume that if they didn’t elect S-Corp status early, the opportunity has passed. It usually hasn’t. Late elections are often available when income patterns change or profitability increases. Structure should evolve as your practice matures, not remain frozen at its starting point.  

For assessment clinics and growing group practices, the conversation can expand beyond a single entity. Testing operations, therapy services, training programs, and supervision may eventually require clearer structural separation for liability, compensation, and scalability reasons. Multi-entity design can improve clarity and long-term flexibility, but only when modeled intentionally rather than layered reactively.

It’s equally important to recognize when an S-Corp is wrong. Volatile revenue, heavy insurance reliance, thin margins, or early-stage growth often make payroll obligations feel heavier than the potential tax savings justify. Payroll does not pause when cancellations spike or reimbursements lag. If income swings dramatically, the projected benefit can shrink quickly.

S-Corp status is situational. It is not a badge of sophistication. It does not signal that your practice is “real.” It means the numbers support it and the compliance discipline exists to maintain it.

When entity decisions are modeled against stable net profit, revenue predictability, retirement goals, and growth trajectory, they create leverage. When they’re adopted because “that’s what other psychologists are doing,” they create friction.

Structure should support the work. Not complicate it

Tax Strategy Framework for Psychologists

A real tax strategy isn’t something applied in March. It’s a system that runs all year, anticipating income, coordinating structure, and controlling timing before the return is ever filed. For psychologists with layered revenue and specialized expenses, that structure becomes the difference between predictability and recurring shock.

The first pillar is quarterly modeling.

Not rough estimates. Not a guess based on last year. Actual forward projections that simulate what your tax return will look like before the year ends. Assessment revenue, therapy income, consulting fees, forensic retainers, W-2 wages, payroll, retirement contributions — all layered into one coordinated view.

When a high-testing quarter hits, the projection adjusts. When a forensic retainer lands, the model updates. When academic income changes, withholding can be recalibrated intentionally. April should confirm the plan, not expose the absence of one. That’s the difference between preparation and strategy. 

The second pillar is retirement coordination.

Psychologists often have access to more flexibility than they realize. A properly structured Solo 401(k) can work well for private practice owners with consistent profit. For hybrid academics, 403(b) contributions must be coordinated with private practice retirement vehicles, not layered blindly on top. Contribution limits are aggregated across plans, and payroll design directly affects how much can be deferred.

For high-profit assessment clinics, layering a Defined Benefit or Cash Balance plan can significantly compress current taxable income while accelerating long-term savings.  

These tools are powerful, but only when compensation structure, entity design, and projected profitability support them. Retirement planning at this level isn’t about picking a plan. It’s about integrating it with how you actually earn.

The third pillar is deduction discipline — without getting cute.

Psychology carries specialized operating costs. Testing materials, protocol consumption, digital scoring platforms, HIPAA-compliant storage systems, EHR subscriptions, continuing education, supervision, conferences, professional memberships, software stacks, travel tied to evaluations or testimony — these are legitimate business expenses and should be captured cleanly.

But deductions are not a strategy on their own. They refine an already-sound structure. If you’re relying on aggressive tax strategies without structure, that’s lipstick on a pig. Real optimization starts with classification, timing, and entity alignment, then uses deductions to support the design. If you’re unclear where the line sits between strategic and reckless, that’s a separate conversation entirely.

When quarterly modeling, retirement coordination, and disciplined expense tracking operate together, the volatility of psychologist income becomes manageable. Revenue may still fluctuate. Assessment cycles may still be episodic. But the structure absorbing that variability becomes predictable.

And predictability is what reduces financial anxiety.

Scaling an Assessment or Group Practice

At some point, a psychology practice stops being about filling your own calendar and starts being about managing a system.

The early phase is straightforward. You conduct evaluations. You see therapy clients. Revenue grows. Overhead feels manageable. Once you add psychometrists, associate psychologists, administrative staff, or multiple service lines, the math changes quickly.

Compensation splits stop being friendly percentages and become structural decisions. A 60/40 split might feel fair. A per-battery payment model might feel efficient. What actually matters is effective margin per clinician after protocol costs, scoring licenses, administrative support, rent, software, billing systems, and compliance overhead are allocated accurately. Gross revenue per evaluator tells you very little. Net profit per clinician tells you whether the model works.

Protocol cost allocation is often where distortion begins. Testing materials are not generic overhead. They are variable costs tied to specific clinicians and service lines. If they’re lumped into a single expense bucket, margin looks healthier than it actually is. Over time, that misperception drives hiring and compensation decisions that quietly compress profitability.

Payroll modeling adds another layer. Contractor versus W-2 classification is not just a preference; it’s a compliance decision with tax and labor implications. State classification tests and supervision requirements complicate that decision further. Misclassification risk is real. So is payroll tax drag. When classification is handled casually, exposure builds silently.

Then there’s the tension between owner pay and reinvestment. As revenue increases, it’s tempting to increase personal compensation immediately. But assessment-heavy practices are cyclical. Insurance panels fluctuate. Academic calendars affect referral patterns. Without forecasting seasonality and service mix, pulling too much cash too quickly can destabilize reserves.

The metric that matters most in a growing clinic isn’t total revenue. It’s net profit per clinician after true overhead allocation. That number determines whether you’re building equity or just increasing complexity.

This is where the difference becomes clear.

A compliance CPA files payroll reports and prepares the return. A business architect models compensation splits before they’re implemented. They stress-test hiring decisions against projected margin. They align payroll, entity structure, and retirement design with long-term growth instead of reacting after problems appear.

Scaling without modeling creates stress. Scaling with structure builds durability.

Ready to Make Your Financial Life Less Complicated Than Human Behavior?

You decode cognitive complexity every day. You evaluate nuance. You design interventions intentionally.

Your financial structure deserves the same rigor.

If you want quarterly projections that anticipate revenue swings, entity decisions that are modeled instead of improvised, and growth plans that measure real margin rather than gross volume, it starts with a conversation.

You can learn more about how we think and how we work, or reach out when you’re ready to install structure beneath your practice.  

You interpret data for a living.

We build the system that supports it.

FAQs

Why do psychologists owe so much in self-employment tax?

Because when you’re self-employed, you pay both the employer and employee portions of Social Security and Medicare. If income isn’t structured intentionally, every dollar of net profit is exposed. It’s not a penalty. It’s the default design of the system. Without modeling, it just feels excessive.

Do psychologists qualify for the QBI deduction?

Sometimes. Psychologists are generally classified as a Specified Service Trade or Business, which means the deduction phases out at higher income levels. Wage structure, entity design, and total taxable income all influence the outcome. A blanket “no” is usually shorthand for “no one ran the numbers.”

Should a psychologist elect S-Corp status?

Maybe. If net profit is consistent and strong, an S-Corp can reduce self-employment tax exposure. If revenue is volatile or margins are thin, it can add complexity without meaningful benefit. The math should drive the decision, not online advice.

Why does assessment income not feel as profitable as it looks?

Because testing materials, protocols, scoring licenses, software, and report-writing time eat into margin quickly. The invoice reflects gross revenue. True profitability only appears once costs and time are mapped honestly.

How does W-2 academic income affect private practice taxes?

W-2 withholding is calculated on that salary alone. It does not account for private practice or consulting income layered on top. Retirement limits are also coordinated across plans, not duplicated. Without integrated projections, hybrid income creates predictable shortfalls.

Do forensic psychologists face different tax issues?

Yes. Large retainers, irregular billing cycles, and potential multi-state exposure introduce complexity that steady therapy practices may not encounter. Without forward modeling, revenue spikes translate directly into quarterly tax shock.

Why do quarterly taxes hit psychologists so hard?

Because most independent income has little or no withholding. Revenue feels strong until estimated payments are due all at once. Quarterly projections smooth that pattern. Waiting guarantees volatility.

What’s the biggest financial mistake psychologists make?

Treating structure as an afterthought. High intelligence and strong revenue don’t compensate for weak payroll design, untracked assessment costs, or absent projections. Small inefficiencies compound quietly for years.

Tax Planning Season

Tax planning season is here! Let's schedule a time to review tax reduction strategies and generate a mock tax return.

Tax Planning Services
Bookkeeping Services

Tired of maintaining your own books? Seems like a chore to offload?

Accounting Services

Professional Consultation

Did you want to chat about this? Do you have any questions for us? Let’s chat!

The tax advisors, business consultants and rental property experts at WCG CPAs & Advisors are not salespeople; we are not putting lipstick on a pig expecting you to love it. Our job remains being professionally detached, giving you information and letting you decide within our ethical guidelines and your risk profiles.

We see far too many crazy schemes and half-baked ideas from attorneys and wealth managers. In some cases, they are good ideas. In most cases, all the entities, layering and mixed ownership is only the illusion of precision. As Chris Rock says, just because you can drive your car with your feet doesn’t make it a good idea. In other words, let’s not automatically convert “you can” into “you must.”

Let’s chat so you can be smart about it.

We typically schedule a 20-minute complimentary quick chat with one of our Partners or our amazing Senior Tax Professionals to determine if we are a good fit for each other, and how an engagement with our team looks. Tax returns only? Business advisory? Tax strategy and planning? Rental property support?

Text WCG Offices

Text WCG Offices

Need to get in touch through a quick text? We'll respond within a day.

Chat our amazing team

Call Our Team

Need to speak to a tax professional now? Give us a call 719-387-9800 and we'll get you connected.

Chat with a tax pro

Chat With a Tax Pro

Taxes can be tricky. Chat with a WCG human now and get questions answered.

After almost 6 years with this CPA group, there is NO ONE else we would trust to do our taxes.

L. Matisek

See Review

We've worked with multiple bookkeepers and accountants over the years and WCG has completely blown us away.

N. Sellden

See Review

As a novice business entrepreneur they provided me with the tools to both structure and tax my business efficiently

Mayon Hight

See Review

They've made my taxes a breeze and are worth every dime I pay them for the peace of mind their services provide.

Lynn Shannon

See Review

The good folks at WCG have impressed me, as being highly competent, patient & friendly.

Fred LeBlanc

See Review

They've made my complicated business life simple and I'd recommend them to anyone with a slightly complicated-to-overwhelmingly complicated tax strategy!

Nic J

See Review

For nearly nine years, I have had the privilege of working with WCG and their team of exceptionally knowledgeable and experienced CPAs.

Alex Hickman

See Review

Amanda - WCG CPA - You guys have been invaluable in helping us get this business and tax planning setup properly and executed correctly.

Lance Dodd

See Review

WCG is extremely knowledgable, timely and attune to the unique aspects of our businesses.

Carl Protsch

See Review

WCG CPAs are professional and a pleasure to work with.

Nakapan P.

See Review

They go beyond the call of duties to assist me not only with Tax return matters but with any questions on other personal and company tax matters.

Juan Mayorga

See Review

I've always dreaded tax season, but WCG has made things so easy, even as we changed to an S corp. So happy we found them!

Paige de Kock

See Review

It was great to find an accounting firm eager to take on new clients, answer initial questions in depth, and support our “keep it simple” philosophy.

Stuart B.

See Review

Working with WCG was so easy, shout out to Sally Rhoades who handled my complicated tax situation this year wonderfully and was available for all my questions.

Stefani Cinto

See Review

I am so thankful to be a client of WCG CPAs & Advisors.

Carol Kersten

See Review

It's a wonderful and rare treat to find a company like WCG these days with their high level of service, personal approach, and deep knowledge of accounting.

Jeffree Hilton

See Review

Such a great firm. Great communicators, great attention to detail and overall great people.

Jeff Owens

See Review