Multiple Shareholders Payroll Split

By Jason Watson, CPA
Posted Thursday, November 2, 2023

Many S corporations have multiple shareholders, and several are husband and wife teams. In these cases, we determine a starting point as a collective and then massage from there. Using $60,000 as an example, perhaps one spouse should be paid $40,000 and the other spouse be paid $20,000 commensurate to his and / or her individual worth to the business. In other words, don’t double the salary once you determine your starting point because you have two shareholders. The starting point is for all aggregated shareholders, and from there you can divvy it up, massage it, increase it, etc.

Your spouse should be considered an officer within the corporate governance or documentation. Otherwise, splitting the salary between the two of you results in a lower overall officer compensation since non-officer salaries are placed on Line 8 versus Line 7 of the S Corp tax return (Form 1120S).

Remember, this would only be for materially participating shareholders. You could have your spouse be an inactive investor in your S corporation at 20% and you would remain at 80%. As we’ve mentioned previously, one of the reasonable salary tests is the relationship between salary and shareholder distributions. Therefore, if you own 80% of a business taxed as an S corporation, you are receiving 80% of the distributions. Subsequently, your salary could be possibly reduced (but your salary is still ultimately dependent on you and your value to the business).

Here is a table assuming a 35% jumping off point for salary with a column at 100% ownership and 80% ownership to further explain-

Income	Salary at 100%	Salary at 80%	Payroll Tax Savings
30,000	10,500	8,400	321
50,000	17,500	14,000	536
75,000	26,250	21,000	803
100,000	35,000	28,000	1,071
150,000	52,500	42,000	1,607
200,000	70,000	56,000	2,142

To reiterate, the $100,000 line above would $100,000 x 80% x 35% = $28,000 resulting in a payroll tax savings of $1,071. Note that is a savings of payroll taxes, and not income taxes since the 80% and the 20% would flow presumably onto a jointly filed individual tax return.